Skip to main content

Most important political issue of Upcoming election



In India at this time assembly elections are on the verge in 5 states and prioritized criteria of every political party is to entice large number of population to secure votes in their favor.

Since the election commission has ruled out strict guidelines regarding the spending by a political party during election and stricter punishment regarding paid news, so it has become difficult to entice population by paid news or by distributing gadgets and stuffs.

The only way to entice population is by passing out some legislation in favor of the people they want to entice to gain vote. On one side of the coin UP chief minister Mayawati announced that UP will be divided in 4 parts- Bundelkhand, Avadh Pradesh, Poorwachal and Paschim Pradesh, though the decision will face a setback forever because parliament in no case would allow such maniac decisions, but it would give a winning assurance to Mayawati, who is now succeeded in enticing the favor UP people by passing such legislation.

On the other side of the coin Congress Government has ruled out a new legislation providing 4.5% reservation for backward minorities within the 27% quota meant for OBC.

The decision would pave the way for reservation in government jobs and educational institutions for minorities as defined in section 2 (C) of the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992. Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists and Zoroastrians (Parsis) are notified as minority communities under Section 2 (c) of the Act. The decision is based on the recommendation of the National Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities.

This decision is considered unconstitutional by both Muslims as well as other parties. Other parties considering it unconstitutional because constitution does not permit reservation based on Religion (though Tamil nadu has such reservation for Muslims) and the other issue is Backward Muslims are already covered under 27 per cent quota for backwards and fixing separate quota on the basis of religion is against the Constitution.

The reason why Muslims are considering it as unconstitutional is that the Rangnath Mishra commission, which submitted its report in 2007, suggested that Muslims should be provided 10% reservation. It means Muslims are demanding more reservation, they are not satisfied.

Government can never satisfy these minorities or reservation hungry people, so better remove the reservation and the majority would be fully satisfied.
copyright©thelegaltrain

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unethical practices in all forms of Business accounting

Accounting is known as the language of Business organisation and mainly concerned with the recording and maintaining of the financial data and communicating   the information or data to the users. Though it is not an easy process as it involves various set of steps between them. Like it starts from 1].Identifying the transaction 2]. measuring and analysing the transactions which involves measuring the transactions in terms of money because as per the money measurement concept only those transactions, which can be measured in terms of money/monetary terms, can be recorded in the books of accounts. 3].Recording the identified and measured transactions in the journal. Journal is a book of primary recording, mainly concerned with writing the transactions for the first time in the books. 4].Posting the information into ledger accounts which is considered as a book of secondary entries. 5].Summarising the information by making trial balance and preparing the income(profit and loss acc...
5 comments
READ MORE »

Decree obtained by Fraud

Decree obtained by fraud will be nullity if decreed to be nullified by the court of competent Jurisdiction *In the case of A.V. Papayya Sastry & Ors vs Government Of A.P. & Ors on 7 March, 2007 It is thus settled proposition of law that a judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud on the Court, Tribunal or Authority is a nullity and non-est in the eye of law. Such a judgment, decree or order by the first Court or by the final Court has to be treated as nullity by every Court, superior or inferior. It can be challenged in any Court, at any time, in appeal, revision, writ or even in collateral proceedings.  *In S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by LRs. V. Jagannath (dead) by LRs. & Ors. (1994) 1 SCC 1 : JT 1994 (6) SC 331, this Court had an occasion to consider the doctrine of fraud and the effect thereof on the judgment obtained by a party. In that case, one A by a registered deed, relinquished all his rights in the suit property...
3 comments
READ MORE »

Procedure for Non-Compliance in holding Board Meetings

Under the Companies Act, 2013, no punishment is prescribed for non-compliance with Section 173(1) in holding at least four Board Meetings in a year, in such a manner that not more than 120 days shall intervene between two consecutive meetings of the Board. Since, no express provision has been laid down, to be followed in case of such failure, the inclusive and residuary provision of Section 450, Companies Act, 2013 shall be deem to be applicable. Section 450 clearly states that: “ In case of any default or failure for which no express provision is stated elsewhere in the Act, the company, or every officer in default shall be punishable with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, and where a contravention is a continuing one, with a further fine which may extend to one thousand rupees for every day after the first during which the contravention continues”. The detailed procedure for the payment of such punishment, levied under Section 441, is channelized through the...
Post a Comment
READ MORE »